Abstract
As Douglas Paal, director of the Taipei Office of the
American Institute in Taiwan, has told President Chen Shui-bian
that the United States is opposed to any forms of referendums
to be conducted in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive government
should stop thinking itself clever enough in deceiving both Washington
and Beijing.
In response to President Chen's recurrent statement that there
will be referendums to be held next year, the Executive Yuan
has prepared for a public poll, defined as "consultative," to
take place in coincidence with the 2004 presidential election.
This will let the public decide whether Taiwan wants to join
the World Health Organization and to continue the construction
of the No. 4 nuclear power plant.
The ulterior objective of this move is obvious. Is anyone in
Taiwan opposed to the idea of Taiwan becoming a member of WHO?
If the answer is no, what's the rationale for such a poll? As
to the power plant, the Legislative Yuan ruled two and a half
years ago, after a heated debate, its continued construction.
Up to this date, the plant's main part has arrived in Taiwan.
Should the equipment be returned to GE on the excuse of the referendum?
The presidential election is forthcoming in eight months. With
a single purpose of winning the election, the DPP has been using
every thing possible to brand the "Pan-Blue" group
as the one betraying Taiwan.
The opposition “Pan Blue” parties should make clear its positions
on "one state two systems" and "one China," in
contrast to the DPP government's policies.
In the eyes of the Pan Blue camp, the "one state two systems" can
never be accepted under any circumstances. However, it can
gain advantage by binding together the principle of "one
China" and "one China, different interpretations." To
Taiwan, the "one China" means the Republic of China,
not the PRC. If the two sides across the Taiwan Straight can
put aside the differences and start to try to solve such urgent
matters as direct transportation and rights of the Taiwan businessmen
on the mainland, there should be no damage to Taipei's basic
positions.
After all, as more than 80 percent of the people in Taiwan
favor the status quo, the various political parties should
actively propagate their party planks before the public.
.....the
full text in chinese